Wow. And you thought you were unprepared for moot court?! Just listen to that guy! (It’s short, only 4 min.)
Overheard Conversation
You think you are a procrastinator. This was the conversation overheard in class the other day:
Slack Master, “Hey, do you have the reading for contracts?”
Classmate, “Um, hold on, let me look it up… it wasn’t bad, 25 pages or so.”
Slack Master, “Twenty-Five pages for the whole semester?”
Classmate, “Um, no, for tomorrow. The semester’s assignments are basically the entire casebook.”
Slack Master, “Really???!”
And I thought I was behind because I’m just starting my outlines! This guy has over 900 pages of reading to do!
A Paper I Need to Read…
Heidi writes about a classmate presenting a paper in Federalism which started out:
“So, I went to Professor Halberstam and said that I wanted to write a paper about states rights in zombie movies. And he said, ‘Well, nobody’s going to take you seriously if you write about states rights.'”
I so want to read that paper…
[Via Letters of Marque]
Blawg Review #1
Blawg Review #1 is hot off the, uh, press. Pick up your copy today!
Survey of Student Engagement
Jeremy has a fantastic Survey of Student Engagement posted today… All law students are definitely encouraged to take it.
More on Law Professors…
Prof. Hurt over at Conglomerate jumps into the ‘where should you go to school if you want to be a law professor fray’ and raises a very good point: it is important to consider current hiring practices and not just the practices of the past.
To respond to some points that have been raised in various comments on other sites:
1. Prof. Leiter notes: “It appears the person (My name is Dave, but you may call me Mr. Gulbransen –Ed.) surveying the Chicago-area law schools was counting clinical *and* academic faculty…” Personally, I don’t care about the distinction. I doubt outside of the cloistered world of the academy, that anyone cares. Undoubtedly it has career implications but I also suspect there are some who would prefer to be clinical faculty. God forbid people entering the field of higher education have different motives.
2. I don’t think it’s any more difficult to pursue an academic career in law than it is in any other academic field. In fact, I’m still surprised that people can get jobs in legal education with only a J.D. (Although, as Prof. Solum notes, and LLM, SJD, or PhD can an advantage.) I mean c’mon people–the scholarly publications of legal education are student edited journals. I do wonder how the world of legal scholarship would be changed if faculty submitted to peer edited journals. I know I’m not the first to wonder.
3. Publishing is lovely; however, there are those who would just prefer to teach–and there is value in that. Law professors would be wise to bear that in mind. Those who graduate, enter the real world, make their fortunes are those who endow the chairs that afford faculty the luxury of academe. They also tend to remember those who taught them best. (And yes, I’m aware that publishing and teaching aren’t mutually exclusive–but those who master both are as exceptional as the Tier 4 graduate professor.)
4. I never stated that I wanted a career in academics. I wouldn’t rule it out, but it’s not something I’ve given much consideration–it is certainly not why I decided to go to law school. Frankly, if I knew with 100% certainty that I wanted to be an academic, I’d get a PhD before I’d get a JD. I’m one of those freaks who went to law school with the notion that the law applies to so many areas of our lives that it would be worth having the degree–whether I practice or not–and whether I stay in my current career path or not.
I just hate to see members of a class (and “law professor” is definitely a class) crushing the dreams of anyone out there who may be wanting to pursue a career in academics. Yes, a healthy dose of reality is important to anyone–no one should be completely blind to the hurdles they may have to overcome to pursue a career in their chosen field. But to say that if you go to a school outside the top [insert arbitrary, self-serving number] then it’s hopeless isn’t doing a service to anyone because it is just not true.
That isn’t to say that someone who graduates at the bottom of their class from a Tier 4 school has a shot at academics; but that’s not really what’s being debated. None of the student voices I’ve heard lack the understanding that the more prestigious your pedigree the easier the road. But there are those out there who would be very comfortable ending up a faculty member at one of those Tier 2, 3, or 4 schools where they could teach students to be lawyers. And not all of those future professors need degrees from Yale to get there.
Something is rank here, all right.
There’s a lot of talk about law school rank these days (I guess there always is)… however, one thing that caught my eye was David Bernstein’s post over at The Volokh Conspiracy. Law Dork and Divine Angst both had some interesting comments as well.
So, in the spirit of procrastination for a brief I’m working on, I did a “mini” survey. I looked at the “rankings” for the schools attended by some law professors who blog:
Blogging Professors | |
Number Surveyed | 47 |
Average Rank | 7 |
Top 10 | 37/47 |
Percentage Top 10 | 79% |
Since I’m all about the City of Chicago, I also decided to take a look at all the law schools in the Chicago area. Here they are, presented in order of school rank:
Chicago | Rank: 6 |
Number Surveyed | 58 |
Average Rank | 6 |
Top 10 | 54/58 |
Percentage Top 10 | 93% |
Northwestern | Rank: 10 |
Number Surveyed | 88 |
Average Rank | 16 |
Top 10 | 66/88 |
Percentage Top 10 | 75% |
Chicago-Kent | Rank: 63 |
Number Surveyed | 69 |
Average Rank | 23 |
Top 10 | 35/69 |
Percentage Top 10 | 51% |
Loyola | Rank: 67 |
Number Surveyed | 47 |
Average Rank | 37 |
Top 10 | 22/47 |
Percentage Top 10 | 47% |
DePaul | Rank: 103 |
Number Surveyed | 62 |
Average Rank | 41 |
Top 10 | 24/62 |
Percentage Top 10 | 39% |
John Marshall | Rank: 138 |
Number Surveyed | 61 |
Average Rank | 47 |
Top 10 | 23/61 |
Percentage Top 10 | 38% |
Note: This was a very cursory survey, based on faculty listings on the school’s websites. I also threw out professors who had degrees from places like “Tokyo University” because I didn’t have a ranking guide handy for them. The other ranks are all based on the latest U.S. News ranking, since that seems to be the de facto standard–for better or worse.
If you want to see the full results–including a break-down by individual faculty members, I’ve put it here in an Excel sheet.
Apparently, there is some hope for those who would like to pursue a career in academics, but don’t have the Top 10 cred.
Would anyone be interested if I expanded this into a full survey/paper?
Calling all Law Students – A Quick Survey
I’m just curious (I’m having issues with my school’s computing support). How many of your schools offer:
1. Wired network access in the classroom?
2. Wireless network access?
3. If they offer wireless network access, how do you authenticate? (If you know.)
Thanks!
Stupid Exam Mistakes
We had a review session last night for one of my exams last semester. Yeah, it’s been over two months since we took the exams, but apparently the law moves slow and academics move slower.
Anyway, I thought I would share with you a mistake that I can only attribute to nerves since it was my very first exam in over 10 years out of school:
“Because John Doe did not die, Mr. Stabby is not guilty of murder.”
(Duh)
“However, he may be liable for murder under the deadly weapon doctrine.”
(Um, you know, if Doe had died.)
I actually laughed when I read that… apparently, so did my prof.
Pony Up the Points!
Jeremy Richey is encouraging everyone to donate their Lexis Points for tsunami relief (via the Red Cross). Just sign into your Lexis account and “shop”… you should see a link to donate to the Red Cross Tsunami relief.
C’mon people! Pony up the points! What the hell were you going to use them for anyway?! Spend the points on something useful!